Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Govs. Scott, Branstad balk at accepting health law Medicaid expansion (video)
The Hill ^ | 7/15/2012 | Jordy Yager

Posted on 07/16/2012 1:36:53 AM PDT by markomalley

Two Republican governors in key battleground states said on Sunday they are pushing to reject matching the federal government’s expansion of Medicaid under President Obama’s new healthcare law.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott and Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad balked at the idea of expanding their states’ Medicaid ranks, saying that their budgets cannot take on additional entitlement spending.

“This is just another government program where the federal government will run out of money and they'll put it on the states again,” said Scott on Fox News Sunday.

“We can't afford it in Florida. Medicaid in our states is growing at three and half times our general revenue. And it's a big program. It's over a $20 billion program. We can't afford it.”

Branstad said his state’s taxpayers would be hurt by adding more people to the list of who is eligible for Medicaid and he pointed to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that allows states to opt out of the federally expanded program without jeopardizing their existing Medicaid funding from the government.

“Our concern is the federal government can't afford it and we don't think that the state of Iowa can do it,” said Branstad, also on Fox. “And what they want to do? Add another 15 million to 17 million people to the Medicaid rolls.

“It's unaffordable, unsustainable at even the federal or state level. And if we buy into it, then we have a maintenance effort requirement and when the federal government can't afford to do it, the burden gets dumped on the taxpayers of our state.”

Instead, the two governors said they were actively exploring private care alternatives for expanding medical access to people whose healthcare benefits would be affected if the state declined to take part in the federal Medicaid expansion.

“We're going to a statewide managed care program... across the state where the Medicaid population will be taken care of by managed care organizations, which will help make sure they get to a primary care doctor, or get to a special, so they don't end up in emergency rooms,” said Scott.

“That's the way to fix it. Don't take money from the federal government that we know long term they're not going to be able to give to us.”

Branstad said he was pressing to strengthen ties between Iowa’s government and private companies in the state as they look for ways to prevent health problems for taxpayers and tamp down on overall healthcare costs as a result.

“We are working in a public-private partnership with private sector businesses like Wellmark, our largest health insurance provider and with Hy-Vee, our largest supermarket chain, identifying ways to help people do health risk assessments and identify how they can reduce their risk factors,” said Branstad.

“And so, our goal is to partner with the communities, partner with the private sector to help reduce the healthcare cost, not buy into a government program that's unaffordable and unsustainable.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Florida; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/16/2012 1:37:03 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

After you think about it a while....it’s like a furniture company offering a big special...free interest for four months, than a sixteen percent interest rate for the remaining months as you pay off the sum. The states would end up creating additional sales taxes and property taxes....going after low and middle-income folks, who would essentially be paying their own Medicare in the end (something that they thought was simply free health care via Medicare). The curious thing is that Congress never spelled out the empty bucket at the end of the jump-start. If you knew you were going to be paying twelve percent sales tax when the federal option ended...you might go into a laughing fit, and never take Congress serious ever again.


2 posted on 07/16/2012 2:30:57 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This will be interesting to see who opts out. It will be especially interesting to watch states like California, which never saw a goofy entitlement or regulation it didn’t love, coming to grips with the ramifications of this just as have gone through a tough budgetary process and seen several of their cities go bankrupt. Bet they take it anyway.


3 posted on 07/16/2012 2:40:23 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I WILL NOT COMPLY
4 posted on 07/16/2012 3:11:54 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson