Replies

Flow Rate: 3,000 L/h = ~833 ml/s.
Cooling water input temperature: 15°C
Cooling water output temperature: ~20°C
Input power from control electronics: variable, average 80 W, closer to 20 W for 6 hours
Excess Power 16 kW

16 kWh=16kJ/sec

2H₂O₂ → 2H₂O + O₂ ΔH_rxn 98kJ/mol

16kJ/sec ÷ 98kJ/mol =0.163 mol/sec

0.163 mol/sec ÷ 0.833L/sec =0.196M

H₂O₂ weighs 34 g/mol

34*(0.196)=6.664 grams of H₂O₂ per liter of solution.

That's weaker than the hydrogen peroxide in my medicine cabinet.

Now tell me again about 1000 times more energy than any known chemical reaction.

Thanks for finally doing your homework. Why does a freeper have to ridicule you so many times just to get you to do your homework?

The last ping on that thread was from me asking Alan Fletcher to cover H202. He never responded.

2H2O2 —> 2H2O + O2 deltaHrxn 98kJ/mol
***That would mean that there’s no H202 on the output water. So how is testing the output going to reveal this as a fake? You would test the input water, to find the 6 grams per liter of solution, which I think was done by observers.

Now tell me again about 1000 times more energy than any known chemical reaction.
***It was observed to be water at the input, that’s how. Rossi could be a fake, that’s why that thread was posted in the first place. Naturally, if you want to pursue this path of calling him a fake using this H202 trickery, you would need to post how Rossi is able to get 600degreesC for 45 days like he’s been claiming lately. There are other researchers who get similar results and there’s no fakery involved; it’s water in and water out, with a delta temp that cannot be accounted for with chemical reactions of only water.