Posted on 07/11/2012 10:18:43 PM PDT by Kevmo
Cold Fusion Is Hot Again - Tuesday, July 17th 9p | 12a ET "A report on cold fusion - nuclear energy like that which powers the sun, but made at room temperatures on a tabletop, which in 1989, was presented as a revolutionary new source of energy that promised to be cheap, limitless and clean but was quickly dismissed as junk science. Today, scientists believe that cold fusion, now most often called low temperature fusion or a nuclear effect, could lead to monumental breakthroughs in energy production."
If you have some refutation of my math, post it here.
If you have anything beyond complete baloney to add, I would be more than happy to accomodate you, especially since you have shown so much kindness on these threads, dear sir. |
the heat generated is several orders of magnitude more than could be possible with any known chemical reaction. /baloney off
baloney |
Reiterating post #85, for those in Rio Linda:
Answer the question. Saying I have no idea is basically admitting that what I said was correct.
If the input water was just water, what chemical reaction could produce a delta temp like that?
And it WAS.... just water, in those 14,700 replications. That is, unless this guy is pushing an ever-expanding conspiracy theory.
I don’t need to,
You didn’t do it 2 years ago, you can’t do it now, you can’t even see the need when your own pride is at stake, your presumptuous horse manure assertion has been disproven, your math only works for one experiment and not for the 14,719 others, your ridiculous claim is 4400 magnitudes worse than impossible. So you might as well just abandon the thread like you did 2 years ago. Unless you believe that 1 in 10^4550 is good odds. I sure would love to play poker against such a brazen fool.
You didn't do it 2 years ago, you can't do it now, you can't even see the need when your own pride is at stake, your presumptuous horse manure assertion has been disproven, your math only works for one experiment and not for the 14,719 others, your ridiculous claim is 4400 magnitudes worse than impossible. So you might as well just abandon the thread like you did 2 years ago. Unless you believe that 1 in 10^4550 is good odds. I sure would love to play poker against such a brazen fool.
Well, lookie here, he’s leaving crickets all over the place.
You had a list of Rossi experiments. I grabbed one at random and proved your ridiculous claim was wrong. Incredibly, ridiculously, unbelievably wrong.
Sorry if that makes you (more) unhinged.
your presumptuous horse manure assertion has been disproven,
I had no assertion, I merely disproved your assertion.
Thanks Kevmo
How would you know that from an obscure survey you've never seen because it's behind a paywall?
. What a crock. It's from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. If you're gonna want to make the case that the CAS cannot count to 14000, you will need to pay up. I'm not going to play into the PTSIFOM mentality on this one. No matter what I draw from that study, you will dispute it because you're mentally hidebound.
And if it were so far off,
National Instruments |
You didn’t prove winky dink.
I'll dispute it because you admit to have never seen it.
I knew you would say that. You don’t know that, you’re just guessing. So, in order to prove me wrong, you’re gonna have to buy it and find out if it really is 14,720 replications... or maybe I got it wrong and it was ONLY 14,718!!!! You’re stuck arguing from silence, a classic fallacy. Best of luck with yet another fallacy from your crowd.
aggressive "humans" |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.