Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thesaleboat
The bill's proponents stress that additional parents added by a court must still meet the definition of a parent under current law.

Supporters of the measure say it stems from a 2011 appellate court decision involving a young girl and her two mothers. When one of the women was sent to prison and the other hospitalized, the girl's biological father was unable to act as her legal guardian under current California law, which only recognizes two legal parents per child.

"Right now, under California law, a judge is being forced to rule in a way that he knows will hurt the child in front of him by denying the child a relationship with a real parent that would otherwise meet the stringent test for being a parent," said Ed Howard, of the Children's Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law.

"This has nothing at all to do with the broader culture wars," Howard told FoxNews.com. "It has to do with recognizing on the ground who should make the call as to whether or not the evidence and the facts show that it's in the best interest of the child."


7 posted on 07/11/2012 8:08:38 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
Your information makes sense, but like most laws that begin for a good reason, this will devolve into a child having to list all the parents involved in the many divorces and/or changes in their "parents" lives. I can also imagine the government requiring child support from all listed parents.

(and by the way, I'm glad you ended up with a good step father in your life)

14 posted on 07/11/2012 8:37:27 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson