It is four months from the election. Wouldn't now be a good time for folks advancing this speculation to provide links to actual claimed evidence in support of this narrative?
I have seen no evidence that would stand up in court disproving Stanley Ann's maternity of Barry or any document on the record affirming that maternity. (Note: the U of WA transcript shows an ambiguous character which in context is a “9” IMO indicating a September start date for night school in 1961).
There is no evidence that FOIA docs linking BHO Sr to Stanley Ann are forged and lots of corroboration that they are genuine. The FOIA docs linking BHO Sr directly to SADO date to as early as April 1961 specify the same wedding date and location as the 1964 divorce docs with SADO being pregnant as of April 1961 and anticipating turning the baby over to Salvation Army as well as anticipating her attendance at U of WA.
There are no coherent narrative in support of the picture of the two boys with BHO Sr in Kenya being anything other than his two sons, Mark and David, and their own mother taken in about 1970.
There is no coherent narrative or evidence linking an Asian appearing US citizen Ann in HI with BHO Sr. as a wife or linking this Asian Ann with the Lebanese Christian Toutonghi family in Seattle, or placing this Asian Ann in Seattle or the Philippines.
1. There’s a lot of evidence that you have not seen, nor I, although I may have seen a little more than you. Doesn’t mean those who have been researching don’t have evidence. They’ll show their evidence when the time is right.
2. Your purported evidence supporting the family mythology in “Dreams” has been taken apart on FR for three years and is not trustworthy at all. For instance, David has taken apart that U of WA bogus transcript several times, that “9” is not all he’s pointed out. You say “I have seen no evidence that would stand up in court disproving SAD’s maternity of Barry etc”. Well, no one has seen ANY evidence that she IS the mother! What you are doing is assuming that the stated purported parentage and official story is true! By default! It’s exactly the argument that since 0bastard is the candidate or President already, it’s up to everyone else to prove that is not eligible, not up to him to prove that he is!
There is no proof that SAD is the mother or that the Kenyan is the father. What little snippets that are sort of available have so many faults that they are patently fraudulent - to the open mind!
3. Criminal investigations are going on and why should any of us demand to see all the cards when this may well jeopardize the investigations? Hold your horses!