Thanks for posting that interesting INS document from the Lolo file. However Lolo and Stanley Ann were not asked to document her prior marriage to BHO Sr but rather her divorce.
In the BHO Sr. INS docs, Sr. is suspected by INS of entering into a bigamous marriage to gain an immigration advantage.
In contrast, in the 1965 Lolo docs, INS suspects Stanley Ann of entering into a bigamous marriage to aid Lolo and demands, in the file page you posted, that proof of “term.” (termination) of the 1st marriage be produced and that “denial” be processed if that proof of divorce isn't provided.
The final note on the INS page is that the divorce decree was produced. The SADO-BHO Sr. marriage was never in question or requested to be documented by INS in this 1965 INS inquiry.
Could it be that she didn’t want to produce the divorce until the last minute because she might have appeared to be a bigamist? On her passport files, she gave different dates for her marriage to Lolo. One date was prior to the date that her marriage to BHO was finalized. If she didn’t wait for the final decree, then wouldn’t she be a bigamist? She may have got away with it because the INS didn’t pay close attention to the date the divorce was final versus when she married Lolo (possibly within the same month, depending upon which date you accept as true. It seems unlikely that a woman forgets when she married, but everything about these people seems unlikely.)
So you found some bear feces without any bells or pepper spray? Congatulations!