Replies

I’m interested in your theory about Obama I making Obama II “100% Kenyan” in 1971, especially after the revelation of the publisher’s biography that said Obama II was born in Kenya. Now there’s another item that suggests he was born in Kenya, or at least that he pretended that was true as late as 1990. http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2012/07/13/obamas-tessellated-pattern-of-reality-more-from-the-1990-harvard-law-revue/#more-15932 A Harvard publication said Obama is an “African African-American”.

Is your theory that he was a U.S. citizen through his mother and a Kenyan citizen, too, through his father’s intervention in 1971? Or do you believe his mother gave up her U.S. citizenship and so couldn’t reinstate his U.S. citizenship? This is really confusing. Why did she have to take him off of her passport? I’ve never understood that part of it.

At Harvard he could have been a dual citizen, if he didn’t let that Kenyan citizenship expire shortly after he reached the age of majority.

Didn’t his campaign say in 2008 that he was born a British subject who automatically acquired Kenyan citizenship, when Kenya became independent? If he didn’t do anything to keep the Kenyan citizenship, then it expired. His campaign said that it did, but we can’t believe anything they say.

How does that fit into the theory that he became 100% Kenyan in 1971?

Do you believe that he attended Punahou as a permanent resident and a citizen only of Kenya? Maybe that’s how he was able to attend those expensive schools, right up through Harvard Law, with foreign student scholarships or grants.

100% Kenyan refers to the fact that his namesake father (forget biology for this) was apparently needed to extract him from Indonesia and cut his ties to Indonesia - legally (in the eyes of governments) and completely.

According to Indonesian law a foreign woman who marries a Indonesian citizen AUTOMATICALLY obtains Indonesian citizenship 1 year after marriage if her spouse does not renounce his Indonesian citizenship in the same period. Thus, in the eyes of Indonesia SAD was a citizen of Indonesia. Was she also a citizen of the US? No according to Indonesia law. But she could have maintained her ‘dual citizenship’ in both countries. She would just have to present herself as a citizen of each respective country while within their borders.

So with an Indonesian step father (very possibly formally adopted) and with a mother who was considered Indonesian Obama HAD to be considered an Indonesian citizen - at least by the government of Indonesia.

But for some reason he returned to Hawaii. Remember that Indonesia was very volatile during this period. The US has assisted the overthrow a communist leaning leader. Events were bloody and things were far from settled in the country. Maybe his safety was at issue. Maybe the Indonesians found SAD was doing the ‘dual citizen’ thing that is against their law. Maybe they did not start the legal 1 year married clock until the family arrived in 1967. But we know that in 1968 Obama II was removed his mother’s US passport. So what passport did he go onto? US? Indonesian? Those are really the only two options at that junction. We only know that he came off of SADs US passport. He HAD to go onto some other passport. Almost certainly this was Indonesian. So in 1968 Obama II likely had and Indonesian passport. Remember the 1969 Christmas picture with Scott? 1969! And there are references to travel back and forth between Hawaii and Indonesia all during the period the family was in Indonesia. So Barry was likely traveling on an Indonesian passport between the US and Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen.

Now why is namesake dad needed? Because Barry Soetoro’s legal guardians are not going anywhere. They are not leaving Indonesia. They are not renouncing their citizenships in 1971. So what legal right does a minor have to renounce their Indonesian citizenship and just move the to US when neither parent is having a change in citizenship? None that I found. But if a birth father comes forward and legally reclaims their adopted child from the citizen step-father or adopted father then there IS a legal path to terminate Indonesian citizenship. And this is why Obama Senior is needed in 1971. He is needed to ‘extract’ Obama II while letting the parents maintain their Indonesian citizenships. Otherwise there is no path for Obama II to terminate his Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia law prevents termination of citizenship if it were to result in a ‘stateless’ status.

So Obama Senior claims his nakesake child - legally. He does this from Hawaii in December 1971. When does this Indonesia, Kenya and the US all probably recognize Obama II as 100% KENYAN at this point. Obama senior HAS to become the SOLE legal guardian. As such, Obama II is now KENYAN without having set foot in the country. Some how, some way the guardianship is then transferred to the Dunhams.

During this period of citizenship and guardianship transfers the records would have all had to have been ‘cleaned up’ to make this happen. Thus Hawaii records would have to record Obama Senior as the father. Even if that was the case in 1961 or later. The records would have altered and refiled to satisfy that since that was required condition for Obama Senior to be able to lay legal claim to his namesake son and extract him out of Indonesia.

This is why 1971 becomes a wormhole of records in Hawaii. Whatever happened before then probably was legally altered and sealed. Not as part of some Constitutional grand conspiracy but to assist with the transfer of a child out of what was likely a dangerous place for an American child at the time.

Hopefully tomorrow will provide some answers. Lets hope so.