When G. W. was in charge, I distinctly remember the lame-stream media giving daily, weekly, monthly and yearly reports on U.S. Casualties in Afghanistan. Gee, I wonder why they have stopped giving those reports. I would think that casualties, regardless of who is in charge, would be their prime objective. Guess not, when it is a “D” named Barack Hussein Obama — the rules of the media have changed.
That’s because the media never gave a damn about the troops to begin with. They only would release the number of dead on a daily/weekly/monthly basis to trash Bush. Now that Obama is in charge, the media can get back to the “Who gives a damn” mentality about our military, who they don’t give a damn about anyway
Don’t forget the balloon drops and confetti when those thousand milestone numbers were reached.
It would have been better if the media had reported how many socialists the Bushes put on the high court.
Are you trying to say that the media and the Dems really didn’t give a damn about our military and were only doing it for political gain? Surely you jest. That would be so shocking if true. /s
Americans don’t seem to die in Afghanistan while Obama is in charge; only “NATO troops” die. This is Obama’s troop surge, too; no GW Bush fingerprints on this...