Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natufian
I read your information. I had seen it before. I was attempting to put this computer printout into perspective and to show that there is no other support for the so called “marriage”. The most logical conclusion is that no marriage occurred.

The State of Hawaii information about Obama, such as the birth certificates, has been so questionable that I do not consider them a reliable source without corroboration.

383 posted on 07/11/2012 4:07:49 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: detective

OK, I think I get it now. When you said there’s no evidence that “they were married or that they even knew each other”, what you meant to say was that there’s all this evidence...

The Hawaii DOH Marriage Registry
Their divorce papers (if you think that’s not prima facie evidence for a marriage, get someone you know who’s single to apply to the courts for a divorce)
Anne Dunham’s registration from August 1961 for the Univ. of Washington in which she applied using her married name.
The internal INS memo from April 1962 which not only mentions the marriage but refers to the likelihood of bigamy.
Obama’s April ‘64 application for extended stay in the US which refers to the marriage.

... but that you’re not buying any of it.


384 posted on 07/11/2012 4:39:27 PM PDT by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson