Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PaleoBob

I think you’re putting too fine a point on it. He did what he had to do to accommodate a very evil man during a time of pressing need, and based on my reading of his remembrances, Roosevelt had nothing to do with it. However, “suck up” is undoubtedly too harsh a term, since it implies obsequiousness. Whatever the case, I would have done the same, assuming I were as perspicacious as Churchill at the time.


20 posted on 07/07/2012 5:17:50 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham; PaleoBob

You may have to define two words - and you know which ones they are - to make you post understandable to PaleoBob and other Galloping Neanderthals.


23 posted on 07/07/2012 6:35:26 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson