Posted on 07/07/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
Ping................
#88.
Thank you, Seizethecarp.
Thanks for the ping.
Back to the thread.
"Stanley's initial role with Barry was as a glorified baby sitter, - because Barry's true mother was an active professional in another line of work internationally, and neither she nor the father wanted their relationship or their son on the public record."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2893952/posts?page=176#176
Also,
See details from David at # 190 on Stanley Ann Dunham Obama's University of Washington Transcript Record
"Grades from her prior academic history were poor so she did not qualify to be admitted to the Day School in 1961...
"On Saturday, August 19, 1961, all doors on campus were locked -- the University was shut down. Stanley neither attended class nor registered on August 19, 1961.
"For those reasons, I believe the so called transcript record of Stanley's attendance at the University of Washington is Fraudulent.
"Further, the transcript record of her address on Capital Hill is the only evidence of her residence at the Toutonghi boarding house and thus in my view casts doubt on the legend that she was in fact there."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2877813/posts?page=190#190
.
Wasn’t the grandfather with the CIA? Always thought his WW2 service and leftist/Communist contacts were odd.
I believe they were married but never actually lived together.
That’s easy - she obviously liked his pipe.:)
Whose pic is that on the right?
As I have reported before I have done do it yourself divorces for my son and daughter and YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO FURNISH BIRTH CERTIFICATES.
In the divorce packet you give the names, date of birth, place of birth etc, of your children, but you do not furnish their Birth Certificates. Remember a Divorce Document is a legal paper and you swear under penalty that all the information provided is the truth.
They were really stupid to pick such a dark black as a moonless night “father”.
What proof do you have? I've never seen any.
0bastard’s mother.
And then he argues that Stanley Ann then didn't USE this legitimacy in the one place that was the whole purpose of the contrived marriage - to name Obama Sr. as the father on the birth certificate.
If the whole point of the marriage was to give legitimacy to the baby (from Ann's point of view) and help Sr. with his immigration status (from his point of view), then it makes absolutely NO sense at all that she then wouldn't go ahead and fill in her "husband's" name on the birth certificate.
The line is for maiden name of mother. Check out the Nordyke birth certificate. The mother's last name is given as Cole.
Obama Sr., by all accounts a playboy, has a one-night stand (or maybe a two- or three-night stand) with Stanley Ann, who was among his conquests at the University of Hawaii.
When a baby resulted, Obama Sr. hestitatingly agrees to marry Stanley Ann.
Certainly possible.
At some point after the February ceremony Obama Sr. discovers that she had also been having sex with the much older Frank Marshall Davis. In addition to disgusting him, that raised a serious question in his mind as to whether he was really the father of the baby. And so from the point he learned about the Stanley Ann-Frank Marshall Davis sexual activity, he simply ignored Stanley Ann and her baby, at least until many years later when the boy was ten years old.
Why is this necessary? BHO Sr. had a long pattern of "loving and leaving" women. One doesn't need to assume any SAD-FMD affair to explain why he left or why he didn't see his child.
It's possible that the baby wasn't BHO Sr.'s, but I don't see the Davis theory as any more likely than any other scenario, including the one presented by the author of the article.
Did the reckless girl go to Kenya (unaware of the first wife) to see the Obama grandparents to pressure Obama Sr. to take her back?
Very unlikely, considering that Hussein Onyango was dead-set against the marriage. Maybe plucky, adventurous SAD ready to go half-way around the world to save her marriage or relationship might be more attractive to some people, but it doesn't look more realistic than other scenarios.
Are you nuts? There are three nudie photos of someone who resembles SAD but none with anyone who resembles her with "many men". And the resemblence is superficial; certain facial structures are completely different such as ears, length of upper lip, and eyebrow/eye slant. Shape of chin is not the same. You're swallowing koolaid.
Obama? Lying and misleading people? :-) He'd already had more than one name, several different Social Security numbers, etc. Besides, see Post 26. He's already prepared everyone for the possibility that his parents weren't married. Not worth hiding his birth certificate just for that reason alone, IMO.
Yelp. But you’d be surprised how often that type of thing happens when an adoption is involved. We KNOW Lolo adopted Barry. Apparently that was annulled at some point...or maybe not.....When an adoption takes place all birth records are sealed. The court issues new âbirth certificatesâ in the new parents name. The original material is null and void and can only be used for ancestry info. When an adoption is nullified, that BC is then voided. Since there is no one to assume that parental role as no adoption is processed, the government assumes paternity and the child becomes a ward of the court/state.
Remember it was the CLinton’s who started the BC search....How convenient.
Not having an original BC is not as unusual as folks think and IMO we are barking up the wrong tree. His passport, naturalization papers, social security records,school records etc are the documentation we should be seeking to prove he his not eligible...a non resident. The BC is a red herring. The “who’s the daddy” and “where was he born” is throwing firecrackers in the camp fire....Just a distraction. Keeping us from what we should be looking into. Freepers, as good of investigators as they are, have taken their eye off the prize....which was 0/Clinton’s intent all along....Dubbed? Look to see what is in the right hand, while he’s/they’re doing tricks with the left.
Are you on bath salts by any chance?
More than just likeness. Nearly identical mannerisms, stature, oratorical flare, and especially that quick flash of a false smile. Check out videos of Malcolm X. The similiarities are uncanny.
(although I think he is an Atheist
I’d consider Satanist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.