Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

I can’t believe they still haven’t started referring to it as a tax deduction/credit for having health insurance.


14 posted on 07/06/2012 2:36:22 PM PDT by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darth Reardon
I can’t believe they still haven’t started referring to it as a tax deduction/credit for having health insurance.

"Tax" is a dirty word to employ while trolling for votes.

22 posted on 07/06/2012 2:50:10 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Darth Reardon

quote “I can’t believe they still haven’t started referring to it as a tax deduction/credit for having health insurance.”

BINGO!

which is exactly what Roberts was basically saying when he called it a tax and upheld it as constitutional.

It’s really no different than the homeowners deduction or the marriage penalty, it’s just about the words.

If you think of the home owners deduction as ... a homeowning mandate, and the marriage penalty as a stay single mandate you will quickly see the logic to Roberts ruling.


37 posted on 07/06/2012 3:49:28 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson