Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

Yep, that’s the point.


92 posted on 07/05/2012 8:46:18 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2; 9YearLurker

Yes but it is even a bigger failure by the court in that they said that they could rule part of it unconstitutional but did not have to rule it all unconstitutional even though there was no separation clause. Without the separation clause the whole thing should have been unconstitutional but the court just breaks its own precedence’s to mess with the citizens.


106 posted on 07/05/2012 9:16:24 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson