Posted on 07/04/2012 1:16:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
The Soviet Union was quite fond of abusing psychology to punish and break dissidents. For all of quix's claim to be opposing globalist marxists, he sure does love to embrace the Stalinist notion that those who disagree with him are mentally ill.
I think they're pretty amusing, as far as obsessed smacktards go.
Link?
Just a casual examination of some of your recent posts shows you are quite fond of charging those you disagree with about Romney as being Obama supporters. At least be honest enough to admit you use that tactic, and often.
I agree Davey - time for Q to get over it and for us to focus on digging the socialists out of washington for good.
Sorry. I have no need to lie. But your behavior on the Romney threads sure looks like you do.
Wouldn't that just make it easier for one of those fallen angel thingys piloting all the UFOs to get to him? Just askin'.
Looks like I missed a lot yesterday! Poor Quix...I truly think something's just not right with that guy's mind.
Odd, I don't recall that.
Maybe Jim does.
Maybe we can make this work. Have the fallen angels/aliens and the Chinese make their move to take over right before half the country is flooded. Maybe hg would end up with beach-front property in the process. Win-win-win.
By the way, I don’t necessarily fault conservative voters for hating Obama so much they’ll set their beliefs and principles aside momentarily to vote for an abortionist/statist. It’s a pity, but that’s their business not mine.
***Well, I find fault in Rogue Yam and other self-supposed conservatives who try to get us conservatives to part with our principles. When that line gets crossed, that’s when flamewars start, those flamewars that you dislike so much. I see you are drawing a line in the sand for Rogue Yam. From my perspective, the line needed to be a bit clearer, a bit earlier. It’s like it is being drawn after he has already crossed it.
It’s very possible an account was opened using your screen name. Those miserable psycho-freaks follow FR like stink on _hit, so they’d love to see you banned and recruited.
I remember being sent a copy of the page wherein the owner/administrator bragged and laughed about opening accounts for ‘onyx,’ ‘TheOldLady,’ ‘Jim Robinson,’ and I think, ‘DJMacWow’. Three of us from Jim’s FReepathon Team.
Look, I’m not going to vote for an abortionist/homosexualist statist. Period. End of story. No sale.
***Good. May the Lord bless you for this principled position. Happy belated 4th of July and prayers up for your family.
Don't know who it is, but Rogue says it's not him and being as his first post featured a vile and pointless insult against Jim, I'm inclined to believe him.
You do agree that someone from here going there to set someone up for a zot here is zotworthy in itself, right?
Don't know who it is, but Rogue says it's not him and being as his first post featured a vile and pointless insult against Jim, I'm inclined to believe him.
You do agree that someone from here going there to set someone up for a zot here is zotworthy in itself, right?
AMEN, Jim. This has to be troubling the hearts of many FReepers who are engaging in it, as they know they're indulging in behavior that is beneath them, but are allowing their anger and frustration to goad them into it. It's sad to witness.
As many of us have been saying all along, Romney is BAD NEWS for everybody. This is one example, a huge red flag, and people are allowing their fear and anger to blind them to that warning flag.
If a landslide victory makes this bastard president and de facto head of the GOP, simple plain logic says that ABOers would experience buyers' remorse so painfully despairing that it would make their current anger and frustration seem like "the good old days."
People, PLEASE consider the ultimate good sense of voting for a plurality; Obama is held in such low regard now that there is virtually zero chance he could get anything but a plurality in the best of circumstances -- much of his support has evaporated over the past four years. HIS WEAKNESS HERE IS A BLESSING WE SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF.
Thinking in terms of what you're voting "against" can be very misleading; you can only vote FOR something, and a vote at the top of the ticket for an official third party candidate is a vote FOR weakening the victory of whichever bastard wins, Obama or Romney. No one -- not me, not you, not anyone -- can materially or mathematically vote "against" either of them. We can only vote FOR something in their stead, and if this presidential boils down to O v R, the ONLY smart and the only moral top-of-the-ticket option for conservative voters is to vote third party and pray for your plurality vote to succeed in forcing the winner into a place where the majority of Americans voted against him.
It is the ONLY vote that will help the conservatives we'll be electing down-ticket. Voting third party to force a plurality is THE ONLY WAY TO HELP CONSERVATIVES.
An entertainment value at twice the price...
An entertainment value at twice the price...
We don't have the option of "firing" him, Trib. We ONLY have the option of hiring someone to take his place.
"Hiring" Romney would be even dumber than leaving Obama there to face the music against strenthened and empowered opposition.
I'm praying for a plurality, and voting for one too.
Putting it together with your off the wall comments here, especially the tactic to smear posters that don't agree with Romney's leftist agenda with the invective of “Mitt hater” etc, didn't seem much of a leap to buy into the True Blew “rogue yam”
Many seemingly good FR members have turned to the dark side in the past and it seemed unbelievable their vile and hateful rants at CP and other anti FR sites.
Reasoned debate is so much better than emotional filled rants, especially those denigrating the owner of this site. And the site it's self.
Sure, there are some here that hate Mitt.
They are a minority of those opposed to his liberal stances.
Reminds me of posting on LDS threads with facts about that belief system and being called a hater of Mormons and Mitt.
Off topic a bit, but seeing many posters castigating those that will not vote for Mitt, and that making them Obama supporters...is disruptive and counter productive.
It's the GOP-e in this cycle and in the last with McCain that has caused them to lose votes because they seem to hate conservatism.
And Romney's backstabbing with millions of bucks and his cadre of staff dispatched to destroy real conservatives (Palin for one, with McCain’ Palin hating staff members switching over to Mitt) coupled with the GOP-e ignoring their conservative base has make it impossible for me to vote for Romney.
Those that blame it on those of us that don't support Mitt are missing the point that it is the GOP that is responsible.
Keeping voting for their “next in line” candidates validates their liberal leanings and they won't stop until and unless we stop supporting them.
The blame lies wholly upon the GOP, period.
May be misspelling in this post, I don't use spell check because sucky IE9 clears my screen when I do.
Not voting for GOP liberals is not a vote for Obama, it is a vote against the GOP-e.
BTW, Jim's post to you in 535 is right on.
Yet, to quote Reagain "there you go again"
Your obsession with "mitt haters" and over analyzing is just usless spinning of your wheels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.