Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x

Right which is why I did not say that nor do I think it. There are many laws that have passed constitutional scrutiny that I do not like. Such is life.

But to my knowledge never has a tax bill originated in the office of the CJ of the SCOTUS. Nor should it have and the sophists who regard this as restraint are fooling nobody with a brain. And it does not even take much of a brain to see Roberts for what he is, a political animal with no regard for the US Constitution who has no business being on the SCOTUS.

BTW, I am not trying to convince anybody of anything, just stating the facts as I see them.
.


26 posted on 07/03/2012 6:29:48 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

“...no business being on the SCOTUS.”

Thats what impeachin’s for....


28 posted on 07/03/2012 6:37:46 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson