Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House to prohibit IRS from implementing healthcare law
The Hill ^ | 7/02/12 | Pete Kasperowicz

Posted on 07/02/2012 3:42:06 PM PDT by Libloather

House to prohibit IRS from implementing healthcare law
By Pete Kasperowicz - 07/02/12 01:25 PM ET

The House as early as next week will pass legislation prohibiting the IRS from receiving any money from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to implement the 2010 healthcare reform law.

Passage of the financial services spending bill is especially timely in light of last week's Supreme Court ruling that penalties the government can impose under the law against people who refuse to buy health insurance can be seen as a tax, because it is enforced like a tax.

That finding allowed the individual mandate to stand, and Republicans have already started reorienting their attacks against the law based on the knowledge that it only remains in place because it is an allowable tax.

The bill would have to get through the Senate and be signed by President Obama to become law.

The House will take up the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act sometime in July, and possibly next week when it returns from the July 4 recess. (The rule governing debate on the bill was already approved last week.) While the Obama administration requested another $1 billion so the IRS can implement the healthcare law, the bill, H.R. 6020, does not give any new money to the IRS.

Additionally, it "prohibits the IRS from receiving transfers from the Department of Health and Human Services to implement the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," according to report language accompanying the bill from the House Appropriations Committee.

The report notes that in 2010, HHS allocated $20 million to the IRS for enforcing the healthcare law "without the Committee's knowledge." It also notes that the IRS received $168 million from HHS to implement the law in 2011, and plans to get another $322 million from HHS in 2012.

"The Committee prohibits further such transfers during fiscal year 2013 in section 106 of this Act," the report states.

The bill would spend a total of $21.5 billion on the IRS, Treasury Department and other related agencies, about 1.7 percent less than the current funding level. The bill increases funding in some areas, such as Small Business Administration business and disaster loans, public safety and education in Washington D.C., and the Treasury Department's anti-terrorism financing programs.

To make up for these increases, the bill makes cuts in several areas, including the executive office of the president.

"The committee is disappointed that the administration's request did not propose additional reductions for the EOP salaries and expenses accounts," the bill report says. "The committee believes that the chief executive of any organization experiencing a fiscal crisis should share in the funding sacrifice along with the rest of the organization.

"Therefore, the committee has reduced the salaries and expenses appropriation for each organization under this heading," it adds.

Specifically, the bill would fund salaries in the executive office of the president at $650 million, down $9 million from the current level. White House salaries and expenses would be cut $2.8 million, and funding for costs related to keeping up the White House would be cut $671,000.

Other executive branch agencies would receive token cuts as well, while the Office of Management and Budget would see funding drop nearly $9 million, to $80.5 million.

The bill would also take a swing at the General Services Administration (GSA), which faced harsh criticism this year for a lavish, 2010 conference in which more than $800,000 was spent. Under the bill, the GSA would face more oversight related to its travel budget, and would be banned from holding conferences that don't comply with relevant laws and regulations.

The GSA would also have to submit quarterly spending reports to Congress, and face restrictions in monetary awards it gives to employees.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; commiecare; deathpanels; healthcare; house; irs; obamacare; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
It's a start.
1 posted on 07/02/2012 3:42:13 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
There is a debt limit increase vote coming.

I fully realize that the House can't get EVERYTHING it wants, but -— I see another opportunity to maybe cut the “Medicaid Expansion” since States don't have to do it now anyway, and -— besides, we are BROKE!

2 posted on 07/02/2012 3:46:42 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
T. E. A.= TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!
3 posted on 07/02/2012 3:47:45 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How about a debate on a fair tax or flat tax! Get rid of the IRS altogether and stop the slavery!


4 posted on 07/02/2012 3:48:29 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
SMLE:

To make up for these increases, the bill makes cuts in several areas, including the executive office of the president

5 posted on 07/02/2012 3:48:52 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying then or now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Full of sound and fury, amounting to nothing.


6 posted on 07/02/2012 3:49:26 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Thank you Chief Justice Benedict Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I got my hopes up....but then I read this and shake my head.

The bill would have to get through the Senate and be signed by President Obama to become law.

I mean, why bother?


7 posted on 07/02/2012 3:51:34 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

The record of the votes will be useful for the elections this fall.


8 posted on 07/02/2012 3:54:12 PM PDT by Ladysmith (The evil that's happening in this country is the cancer of socialism...It kills the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This will likely go nowhere.


9 posted on 07/02/2012 3:54:29 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
How about a debate on a fair tax or flat tax! Get rid of the IRS altogether and stop the slavery!

Hear here!!!

10 posted on 07/02/2012 3:55:02 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Ron Paul, amidst his tin-foil hat antics, actually made a good argument about the illegality of the IRS.


11 posted on 07/02/2012 3:55:02 PM PDT by max americana (Make the world a better place by punching a liberal in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Because it makes the RINOs APPEAR to be against 0bamacare?


12 posted on 07/02/2012 3:55:48 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Boehner just isn’t really in this seriously enough to block the disastrous raising of the debt ceiling until O-care is repealed.

Truly sad!


13 posted on 07/02/2012 3:56:46 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
The bill would have to get through the Senate and be signed by President Obama to become law.

Well you knew that.

It's also the way "it works" to package the things you want in a "must pass" bill and then play hardball with the administration - something our side is NOT very good at, always worrying about how it looks, and the MSM makes sure it doesn't look very good.

Spineless wimps.
We're doomed.

14 posted on 07/02/2012 3:56:57 PM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party of NO! Nobama, No Way, No How!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

>> “I mean, why bother?” <<

.
To please the sheep that don’t know any different.
.


15 posted on 07/02/2012 3:59:31 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They had me till they said it had to go through Reed and Obama..

Dead on arrival this one is.


16 posted on 07/02/2012 4:00:09 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

The big one is getting back to the US Federal Government having LIMITED powers.
Which true tax reform would be part of that equation.


17 posted on 07/02/2012 4:01:47 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The bill would have to get through the Senate and be signed by President Obama to become law.

Do you honestly think this will be a successful effort?

18 posted on 07/02/2012 4:01:47 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

The “fair” tax would be worse slavery than we already have.

Sales taxes let the truly rich (that don’t work, or participate in our earned ‘economy’) get off completely untaxed.


19 posted on 07/02/2012 4:03:50 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A good start. THey need to bombard this 0bamacare within every bill submitted, death by a thousand cuts. Tag every bill with some takeaway from 0bamacare.


20 posted on 07/02/2012 4:04:21 PM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson