“The “sealing” of birth records in adoption are to protect identities of “losing” parent, etc. This is not an issue here. IF the original long form BC were to show damning evidence against Mr. Obama in regards to actually place of birth, they could be unsealed and used. The hard part is getting a judge to order it...and getter around any state laws that may prevent it.”
Sealed records by Court order can be unsealed by Court order if there is a compelling reason.
Obama’s Original Long Form BC was sealed after BHO Sr. complained the Soetoro adoption was invalid because he was not properly notified AND Stanley Ann testified in the adoption nullification hearing that BHO Sr. was not the biological father.
We know Stanley Ann tried to preserve the Soetoro adoption by claiming BHO Sr. was not the biological father because the Original Long Form BC would have been unsealed and reinstated after the adoption was annulled. The reason the Court sealed the Original was sealed was because it contained a signed statement by Stanley Ann attesting to the veracity of the statements on the Original. Stanley Ann contracted her 1961 attestation in 1971 by stating BHO Sr. was not the biological father.
After hearing testimony and examining evidence, a HI Judge ruled BHO Sr was the father, Lolo Soetoro was not the father of BHO II, the Soetoro adoption was annulled, and an abbreviated short form COLB was Ordered to be created with the vital information the Court found to be fact. That’s why the short form has a date filed and not a date accepted.
There is not compelling reason to unseal the Original. The only thing different on the Original from the short form COLB is the witness attestations and the date accepted.
Obama’s vulnerability is in his immigration file with USCIS and not with the HDoH.
Sven:
Has Sheriff Joe’s team been in touch with you about this?
“Obama’s vulnerability is in his immigration file with USCIS and not with the HDoH.”
Didn’t USCIS claim no documents exist?