I thought it was because the information is not as compelling as they would like, and I suspect they are hoping for more stuff to be discovered in the meantime so as to flesh out their argument better.
I hope i'm wrong, and that their information lives up to it's hype. I just can't help but wonder why, if it's so good, that it needs to be spoon fed to us, but perhaps we are not the intended target anyways.
There really is no need to convince us, (We are already convinced that there's a rotten smell in all of this.) the proper targets are the skeptics, so in that regard, perhaps getting their arguments and evidence into a fool proof configuration is really the correct thing to do at this point.
I believe that is exactly what they're doing. They must have documents in hand, screen snapshots, maybe witnesses (revealed or eventually available,) security for a slew of people to guard against Breitbarting, etc.
I think it was a good "postponement" to clear the SCOTUS crap of AZ, followed by 0b0z0CommieCare...tax...no tax...punishment...no punishment...until you run out of petals!
The media will have nothing MORE important to hide under. Still, knowing them, they won't write about it but will "ridicule the birthers, flat-earthers, etc." unless 0kaka wags the dog in Iran or some other disasters happen in the Middle East, which he is totally responsible for.
But, that's another story.
very deep thinkin and here is why...on many occasions I’ve alluded to press room size....the March 1st world settin Arpaio presser where a sittin sheriff accused a sittin President of submittin fraud in the form of necessary documents for life.
That room was at capacity at 45 people....so why such a small venue ?
cause the video was the reason for the presser...why ? evidence in all fiddy seven states is why