Bottom line, the ruling hurts Obama. A rejection would have hurt him , too. But upholding on the commerce clause would have helped him. IMO.
“Bottom line, the ruling hurts Obama”
I agree, but Roberts should be impeached anyway.
The way I see it, Roberts was either bribed, blackmailed or tried to manipulate the outcome of the election.
All of these scenarios make him unfit to be the chief justice and we shouldn’t have to live with this mistake for another 30 years.
The bottom line is that the man is a traitor and I have less respect for him now than I do about the lib members of the court. The fact that after the ruling he ran away to his “impregnable fortress” in the Mediterranean clearly indicates that he is aware that what he did was wrong.
“Bottom line, the ruling hurts Obama. A rejection would have hurt him , too. But upholding on the commerce clause would have helped him. IMO.”
That’s not the bottom line t all. The bottom line is we have a lawless Supreme Court, or at least a Chief Justice with no respect for the limits the Constitution places on government power. Either way, maybe it’s great for the Romney campaign, but it’s a sad day for our constitution, our republic, and our nation.
“Bottom line, the ruling hurts Obama. A rejection would have hurt him , too. But upholding on the commerce clause would have helped him. IMO.”
That’s not the bottom line at all. The bottom line is we have a lawless Supreme Court, or at least a Chief Justice with no respect for the limits the Constitution places on government power. Either way, maybe it’s great for the Romney campaign, but it’s a sad day for our constitution, our republic, and our nation.