You're right, Justice Roberts set precedent, but he did so by ignoring precedent. As is evident from this decision and about every liberal decision of the past 75 years, only conservatives care about precedent. Liberals are busy making a revolution and precedent is their enemy, at least usually. So, precedent is not binding on liberal justices. Conservatives have to start playing by the same rules. There is no stare decisis now, there is only the brute force of a 5-4 vote. Constitution? Without stare decisis, it's a dead letter. We need to accept this terrible fact.
“You’re right, Justice Roberts set precedent, but he did so by ignoring precedent. As is evident from this decision and about every liberal decision of the past 75 years, only conservatives care about precedent.”
That needs a little editing. Conservatives care about sensible, rational, and honestly, thoroughly reviewed precedent-setting. Precedence comes in as many forms as actions—good, bad, right, wrong, and everything in between. Roe, like so many bad decisions before and after it, was bad, dishonest, and irrational. And Conservatives are rightly wary of any decision based in whole or in part on previous bad calls.