As opposed to what? Having the states forced to pay? Typical liberal mindset.
Bookmark
Another can of worms.
This Obamacare BS is opening up new cans of worms every day.
It has to be the most expensive, most ignorant, most poorly written pice of crap to ever hit washington.
But that ws expected when we got the Kenyan.What is good enough for Zimbabwe is good enough for us.
Nothing reveals a bad law like it’s enforcement.
Bobby Jindal told the Feds to “stuff it”, and won’t set it up in Louisiana.
This was a thinly veiled attempt by the Obama regime to force the states to increase taxes. The poor in states without expanded Medicaid will get better coverage than those forced into Medicaid Hell.
The fairy Medicaid Mother would step in and pay.
What are the Obama operatives at the commie Hill talking about ?
The 26 states Won and can not be forced or threatened to
Implement the Obamacare plan !
And so far Fl,La,Ks have notified all it’s not happening there .
Taking this at face value, it means much more.
For example, “blue” states, already financial basket cases because of their unwillingness to curtail spending, are more than willing to strangle business through required unionism demands and now taxation, yet are apparently going to now import vast numbers of non-working, poor people to get on their Medicaid dole.
“Red” states, on the other hand, are already moving to economic viability by being willing to cut back spending, lower taxes, and allow market forces to work. They will likely slash their Medicaid payments down to the “poverty level” minimum, driving out vast numbers of “minimum wage poor people.”
In a nutshell, “blue” states == high prices, high taxes and reduced tax revenue, few jobs and fewer businesses, lots of poor people resulting in higher crime rates, homelessness, etc. Their finances will be a mess and no Republican president is going to give them “free money” that they can waste.
They will go the path of California.
“Red” states, on the other hand, will have lower prices, lower taxes and higher tax revenue, low unemployment and many new businesses resulting in high wages, budget surpluses, few unions and low crime.
And they will not be thrilled to fund the folly of the “blue” states.
Wow! That’s a new wrinkle I haven’t thought of!
Analysis: Ruling adds hundreds of billions to healthcare law costs ... WITHOUT ADDING ANY ‘HEALTHCARE’ AT ALL.
It will actually reduce ‘healthcare’, especially for the sick or elderly.
WOW - What a choice!!! Should we pay State Taxes or should be pay Federal taxes?
We the taxpayer pay the bill in each case.
It’s a function of how this crappy bill was written.
One healthcare analyst has said that states could make out better by abolishing Medicaid completely in their states and dumping the poor into the federally funded exchanges.
Just one way to game the system.
meanwhile, businesses will game the system by dropping health insurance.
individuals will as well.
It will explode the federal deficit while destroying our health insurance system.
And the mandate wont work, so say doctors:
http://usa.m3.com/pressdetail.cfm/711/scotus-flash-reaction-survey-64-of-primary-care-physicians-say-individualmandate-wont-work?utm_source=in-house-msg&utm_medium=message&utm_campaign=flash-survey-results
ObamaTaxCare is a train wreck.