Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911
I know Krauthammer says its because Roberts is so noble he didn't want the Supreme Court to overreach its bounds by usurping power over Congress but sorry Chuck I ain't buyin' that one.

I like Krauthammer but sometimes he is a total moron. How the HELL can he say by Roberts declaring the penalty for not buying insurance a tax and then sending it back to be rewritten as a tax is in any way usurping power over Congress?

56 posted on 07/01/2012 6:57:32 AM PDT by scram2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: scram2

Krauthammer makes the case that the Supreme Court, Congress and everyone is protected by Roberts by the way he finessed obamcare into a tax. I’m not buying it.His comments are here at Hot Air for those who really care,usually I do. NOt buying it this time.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/29/krauthammer-roberts-pulled-off-one-of-the-great-constitutional-finesses-of-all-time/


69 posted on 07/01/2012 7:14:42 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: scram2

As much as I dislike Justice Roberts’ vote, it is consistent with the idea of calling balls and strikes. The Supreme Court does not have to agree with the law or the tax, or even if the law or tax is a good idea or a bad idea; all they are supposed to do is decide if what Congress does is constitutional or not. In that sense, what Roberts did makes sense. We would like it better if we agreed with the outcome.


70 posted on 07/01/2012 7:15:55 AM PDT by Bernard (When the only Problem is overspending, all the Solutions look like TAX INCREASES to liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson