I read your tagline. So, you are supporting the ‘all or nothing man’. Well, within three years the people will see what results from such a position. Sadly, we should have seen what Hoefling’s all or nothing means in the abortion issues, since he was even opposed to the partial birth abortion ban because it did not ban all abortions. Now we get to see that same all or nothing applied to allow little barry bastard commie to continue in power, with the accompanying gaggle of holderesque thugs and their globalist agenda.
I absolutely will not reward Myth Romney for his disgusting tactics and I am quite surprised and disappointed in you who I have always seen as a consistent pro-lifer here but, if you can vote for an abject serial liar and babykiller on autokill on the subject like Myth Romney, I guess I misjudged you.
Your position on all or nothing proves the thesis of your unreliability. Tell us how many babies it is OK to see killed by the policies of Myth and his appointments who will just know better than to pay any attention whatsoever to thee much less to me on the subject since, as his ideological twin Obozo has said, we are "bitter clingers" and are therefore beneath being paid attention except insofar as outright lies might corral the votes of Pollyannas and gullibles. The death toll of the unborn will reach 60 million in the next term under Obozo or under Romney. If you hallucinate that Myth is reliable to save so much as one baby, you are in way over your head, politics is not your thing and you should find new hobbies. How many babies is it OK for Myth and the Junior Leaguers and polo players to arrange to be murdered?
BTW, take the late term abortions off the table and they are no more common than abortions resulting from rape and you accept the argument of the death cult that some babies (the overwhelming majority) need not be saved. The SCOTUS case of Webster vs, Planned Barrenhood resulted from EXACTLY this accommodationist (Can't we all just get along???) slimeball mentality and resulted in a ratification of Roe vs. Wade as "settled law" around which American women had arranged their lives and their was no going back on baby-killing, at least according to Sandra Day O'Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor and, I believe, David "Swish" Souter each and every one a "Republican" appointed by better men than Myth Romney. Now we can add Sandra Day O'Roberts as a new swivel-hipped treasonweasel to the cause for which he was appointed.
Do you actually think Romney is less of a globalist than Obozo??? Or that he will have an Attorney General who will not persecute churches and support baby-killing? Your proof is????
The day will come when you will hang your head in shame for believing Myth Romney any more worthy of support than is Obozo. Cristo was another "all or nothing man." Or do you think He had an "acceptable" quota of sliced, diced and hamburgerized innocent infants in utero in mind??? When I say I am pro-life, I REALLY mean it.