Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kazan

An excellent point, Kazan.

As a matter of strategy, do you want Obama to retain the Presidency?


265 posted on 06/30/2012 7:17:50 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your damn Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric
As a matter of strategy, do you want Obama to retain the Presidency?

I don't want either Obama or Romney in the White House. But, I don't want Scott Walker or the equivalent in it in 2017. That isn't happening if Romney wins the election.

287 posted on 06/30/2012 11:14:48 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric; Kazan
GE asks K: As a matter of strategy, do you want Obama to retain the Presidency?

I want whichever authoritarian government statist who wins, Obama or Romney, to be as weak and vulnerable as possible. In order to vote for that, I must forfeit any influence over which of the two menaces wins, but the pay-off is that my on-the-ballot official third-party vote (guaranteed not to disqualify my ballot, as a write-in might) will count toward a split vote plurality, and a plurality win will weaken and hurt the next president -- a good thing since either one is an enemy of freedom and limited government conservatism.

As a matter of strategy, I will be voting FOR a plurality. It's the ONLY way I can use my vote at the top of the ticket to help all the conservatives I'll be voting for down-ticket.

387 posted on 07/02/2012 9:48:54 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson