Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric
Because tacitly supporting the significantly greater evil is a rational choice. /s

Do you understand that some people's consciences will not allow them to support evil?

Do you think it appropriate to try to coerce people into violating their conscience?

177 posted on 06/30/2012 4:00:48 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Liberty. What a concept. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

>> Do you think it appropriate to try to coerce people into violating their conscience?

Criticizing is not coercion. Nice try.

Romney is a crap shoot on Life. Obama is guaranteed Pro-Abort. So does your conscience prevent you from gambling too? You don’t think there’s any chance that Romney with both GOP Houses will sign anything positive into law? Are you that convinced he will legislate just like Obama? Is there any chance PP funding would be curtailed with the GOP controlling all 3 Houses? Is it really worth it to not take that chance, and consequently assist the Left by default?

A conscientious decision can look past personal repulsion if the outcome improves the odds on Life.

We need to take all 3 Houses if we hope to improve the situation. Not voting helps to make that improbable. Got conscience?


214 posted on 06/30/2012 5:06:10 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your damn Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson