Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

67 posted on 06/30/2012 11:40:48 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Ooops, I forgot my comment!: Here's the verbal exchange between Holder and Chaffetz regarding the above Email which Holder contents is NOT talking about Fast & Furious (yeah right):

Holder told the committee: “That refers to Wide Receiver, not to Fast and Furious. The e-mail that you [Rep. Chaffetz] just read [between Trusty and Weinstein] – now this is important – that email referred to Wide Receiver, it did not refer to Fast and Furious. That has to be noted for the record.” Chaffetz, after a long pause, said, “No, it doesn’t. It says Fast and Furious. ‘Do you think we should have Lanny participate in press when Fast and Furious and Laura’s Tucson case [Wide Receiver] are unsealed?’ It’s specific to Fast and Furious. That is not true, Mr. Attorney General. I’m happy to share it with you.”

68 posted on 06/30/2012 11:43:45 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson