Even those making the case that he went the"its a tax direction" and now we can get rid of it with only 51% and the rats have to run on obamacare as a tax and not a mandate is hardly enough to justify rewriting a law instead of interpreting it as constitutional or not.
That is not the purview of any judge especially a Supreme court judge. My understanding is they are supposed to interpret the law that is before them not rewrite it to favor one side or the other.
Huge judicial error.
After that the obvious question begs why, why, why did Roberts chose the path he chose.
IT also questions why and how Judges are chosen and how many hidden agendas there may or may not be.You only have to look at left wing picks to ask many questions.
Agree, rodguy911.
On the “why” Roberts did what he did, it may not be bugging Rush, but it’s really bugging me. His decisions this week made no sense. Maybe Roberts is just that stupid.