[Paladin2]

"“Roberts took the opportunity to slap down the voting public, rightfully telling US that it is our responsibility to elect people that represent our views. He is 100% correct on this count.”

And his statements to that effect within the decision itself was the truly sweet part of this.

"

This argument is specious.

The 2010 elections were a direct result of 0bama/Roberts Care. Had the SCOTUS sent the bill back to Congress for a do-over, it would not come out of the current representation anywhere close to where it is now. The people did speak at the ballot box and Roberts vetoed their input. Roberts is constitutionally retarded.

[cuban leaf]

—This argument is specious. —

It is not an argument. It is an observation.

[FirstFlaBn]

All of these legal niceties ignore the precarious economic straits we are in. Teetering on the edge of the precipice, our only hope was for business to gain some short term hope had Obamacare been thrown out. The fact that now it will be at least seven months before any action to cripple or repeal will be undertaken may be the difference.

Unfortunately, big economic changes take at least six months to affect things - just enough to get Obama past election day. (then comes the crash)