These stupid ass analogies are getting old...
Here is the only one that is appropriate...
You are at war with socialism. Socialists want to enslave you to their socialist tyranny.
You have a weak but somewhat effective opposition to the socialist agenda on the battlefield. Its a ragtag opposition infested with enemy agents but it does, at least, oppose the socialist agenda of what the members of this force perceive as the “other team”.
1. Now, for some reason, the opposition force against socialism decides to put a socialist at the head of its party. This transforms the already weak, disorganized, (and tragically betrayed by enemy agents within its ranks) opposition force into a rubber stamp for continued implementation for the socialist agenda.
2. Or keep the socialist on the “other team”, strengthen your opposition force with fresh reinforcements and weaken the enemy infiltrators, then continue opposing the socialist agenda with renewed vigor.
3. Both one and two are losing strategies. Option one is a total disaster, option two maintains (or slightly improves upon the status quo). The best option is to Dump Romneys sorry socialist ass at the convention and pick up ANYONE ELSE who fits two simple requirements, they need to be anti-socialist and they need to be for limited government.
A post to support your thoughts.
But you know that's not going to happen.
By not nullifying the vote of some excrement covered Occupy punk living in their parent's basement, that could very well affect me in an adverse way.
Replace it? With what??