Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

The conventional wisdom on this is that Roberts sided with the liberals primarily because he was afraid of the criticism that would come down on the court if he didn’t. If true, that makes him one of the most spineless pussbags ever to wear a robe.


98 posted on 06/28/2012 10:21:41 PM PDT by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Junior_G

No, he sided with the liberals because he has two kids adopted illegally. Two blond haired, blue eyed kids from South America via Ireland. As an adoptive mom, WTH!! I know when some thing is funky, and this is not something I have ever heard of. Trust me, Robert’s opinions is compromised.


110 posted on 06/28/2012 10:32:02 PM PDT by BLOC77 (i was pro-life before pro-life was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Junior_G; All

I agree with you and with every other comment that disagrees with the premise of the article.

I posted the article to see whether it had any merit.

Now from reading all the comments, I see it doesn’t.

Thanks to all for commenting.


230 posted on 06/29/2012 6:46:03 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Junior_G; All

Repeating your comment that I agree with (plus as I said all the others I’ve read:


The conventional wisdom on this is that Roberts sided with the liberals primarily because he was afraid of the criticism that would come down on the court if he didn’t. If true, that makes him one of the most spineless pussbags ever to wear a robe.


233 posted on 06/29/2012 6:47:31 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson