Occam's Razor.
Did Robert's vote on the Arizona case make any more sense than this?
Roberts is either a liar and phoney who was never a conservative or he has been compromised. His opinion in this case is not even readable. It is violently incomprehensible. It is the worst piece of legal reasoning I have ever tried to read and I could not get through it.
So what do you think it was? A dead woman or a live boy?
Maybe this - epilepsy meds, and a comment about an investigation into his kids’ being adopted perhaps illegally or irregularly:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2900740/posts?page=4#19
I don’t think it was a dead woman, unless that woman was Lady Liberty.
I can’t read any legal stuff and understand it, so I take your word about it.
I hated his vote on AZ too.
Thank you for your statement, I have read several statements that Roberts argument is strange to say the least. He twisted himself into a pretzel to rationalize his reasoning. There is no legal reasoning. He is trying to ptotect his family. Illegal adoption! I am a adoptive mother, I know when something smells funky. Trust me.