Roberts linked himself to the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision by using it’s style, its denial of basic human rights and decency, and it’s potential for creating violent situations.
Dred Scott was a Constitutional finding according to the legal precedent set by an Appeals Court for the US Supreme Court in 1835's Jack v. Martin . The result of the unCivil War was that the federal government gained the power to define the limits of its own authority, and was, in a nutshell, nothing more than the 1800's version of today's 'social justice'.
Sorry, but cheering on one hand for Constitutional deconstruction and then complaining that the deconstructed Constitution isn't protecting 'basic rights' is REALLY hypocritical.
They were given the key. Why is everyone so suprised that they're using it?