Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Is it because Roberts is off his meds, or is it because he's on meds to prevent seizures?
1 posted on 06/28/2012 3:46:43 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Now they can tax us for anything. Will you have to pay a special tax to own a gun? Will there be a special tax to vote? Of course they pick and choose who to tax and for whatever reason there is nothing objective in their methods. They could slap a property tax on just about anything you own. They can even tax you for things you don’t own or choose not to purchase. This is absolute insanity.


2 posted on 06/28/2012 3:51:35 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The one argument that Roberts used to justify this disastrous law is the one that makes the least sense.
3 posted on 06/28/2012 3:52:21 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I’m thiking the same thing. Now we can be taxed for not doing or buying something.


5 posted on 06/28/2012 3:54:09 PM PDT by e_castillo (Drill here drill now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If it is a tax, it’s a Direct Tax which is unConstitutional.

But we live in a post-Constitutional Republic.


6 posted on 06/28/2012 3:54:37 PM PDT by Tzimisce (THIS SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This question about Roberts isn’t a mystery and there’s no conspiracy, you just have to think about it for a second. Presidents appoint justices that fit their ideology. Bush was pro-life (Roberts is), pro-gun (Roberts is), pro-marriage (Roberts is), pro corporate spending (Roberts is). He was also an illegal lover (Roberts is) and a big spender on healthcare laws (Roberts is). He’s voting the same way GWB would if he was a SCOTUS judge.


8 posted on 06/28/2012 3:58:01 PM PDT by PAConservative1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Regardless, he betrayed the Constitution and his actions, and those who sided with him are traitorous.


9 posted on 06/28/2012 3:58:09 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

11 posted on 06/28/2012 3:59:28 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
   The Constitution does not give the Court the power to rewrite statutes, and Roberts and his colleagues have therefore done violence to it.

  If it's been 're-written' by the court to make it constitutional, then the original law (as written) must be unconstitutional.
12 posted on 06/28/2012 4:01:51 PM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I am sick to my stomach. This is a dark day for the republic.


15 posted on 06/28/2012 4:03:09 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Someone with PhotoShop skills...please rework the old “Dallas” promo...replace Hagman’s face with the chief justice’s and caption it: “Who bought JR?”


16 posted on 06/28/2012 4:03:09 PM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Roberts could have easily and justifiably ended at least on of the chapters of misery and cliff hanging uncertainty that has burdened this country for too, too long.

He manipulated what the administration and lousy congress and spinate swore was not a tax into being a tax for his convenience. Why? Only he and God know. His logic is so twisted and perverted that one quickly and easily is drawn to the conclusion that he acted in some self-interest.

There are so many trying spin this as good and justify Robert’s treason. I think they protest too much. I smell crap.

As for me and my house, may John Roberts rot in hell and go down in history as a traitor to the principles of freedom, the Republic and the Constitution. All three of these seem to be taking a long walk off of a short pier. I hope that he has a long and miserable life... a short one would be too good for him. If there is justice he will agonize and regret this decision for eternity.


17 posted on 06/28/2012 4:04:03 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It seems to me that as bad as the USSC upholding commiecare was, something really positive came out of it.

Most of the laws that come out of Washington that expand government and tramp on the 10th amendment are based on the commence clause. While it may be true that the feds can force us to buy toothpaste... There not going to be able to justify it with the commence clause, and they are very unlikely to want to call it a tax.

Taking away the commence clause crutch is going to make it very difficult for congress to justify the constitutionally of a large portion of the laws and regs that come out of Washington.


18 posted on 06/28/2012 4:05:15 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I’ve said this before. I hope Roberts burns in hell.


19 posted on 06/28/2012 4:06:48 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Look this is judicial activism writ large. Roberts has no power to rewrte statutes. He is as lawless as Obama and should beheld in contempt by all thinking people.


20 posted on 06/28/2012 4:06:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Chief Justice Roberts’s Folly

We haven't heard the slogan, "IMPEACH THE CHIEF JUDTICE" since Earl Warren's tenure. Guess its time to renew the cry.

21 posted on 06/28/2012 4:08:23 PM PDT by GoldenPup (Comrade "O" has got to GO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

More crap in this article.

It’s ‘Robertscare’ now. He bought it. He owns it.


23 posted on 06/28/2012 4:10:27 PM PDT by citizen (Obomo blames:Arab Spring,Banks,Big Oil,Bush,Ceos,Coal,Euro Zone,FNC,Jpn Tsunami,T Party,Wall St,You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The constitution has been betrayed. The rule of law has been betrayed. The American people have been lied to and betrayed. The Republic has not been kept. A dangerous world is one step closer to the end of all freedom. Limitless government is forcing its power and reach to control every aspect of our lives. Well everyone one of you in government can just kiss my a$$.


26 posted on 06/28/2012 4:15:21 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

What does obama have on roberts?


28 posted on 06/28/2012 4:21:29 PM PDT by aomagrat (Gun owners who vote for democrats are too stupid to own guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I can think of a few reasons why Judge Roberts decided as he did.

First, he said that, it’s not the role of the Supreme Court to protect the people from the consequences of the political decisions which the people make. In that sense, he’s punishing the people for voting in the people who created and voted for Obamacare. (Never mind that, the rest of the people who didn’t vote for the commiecrats, are also being punished). In that sense, Roberts might be thinking the way I feel, which is, that the people won’t learn the tough lessons of socialism, until they find themselves in deep depression and desperation, or like a Greece.

Then, Judge Roberts may be forcing Obama and the democrats to have to defend Obamacare and their tax and spend policies, during this coming election, and if the people are smart and notice the dangers the country is headed towards, then Obama will be voted out, and many other democrats will lose their seats.

Also, keeping Obamacare as an election issue, is one way to help replace Obama, and, Roberts might be feeling confident that, with a republican congress and a “republican” president, that Obamacare will be repealed, and therefore, still meeting the death it well deserved.

So, Roberts might have been planning to kill two birds with one stone, Obama and Obamacare, while teaching the people a well-deserved lesson that stupidity deserves.


32 posted on 06/28/2012 4:28:52 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Roberts’ decision is like the surgeon about whom it can be said that, “The operation was a success, but the patient died.”


43 posted on 06/28/2012 5:05:25 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson