[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

You have NO IDEA how Harriet Meirs would have ruled. She was a LOUSY nominee, a pro-abort, and a crony.

Some of us remember how horrible she was. Talk about misguided nostalgia!

Wake up. this is 2012.

[xzins]

Harriet Miers might have been a lousy nominee, but she was pro-life.

Fought ABA endorsement of Roe v. Wade. (Oct 2005)

Prohibit all abortions except to prevent mother’s death. (Apr 1989)

Oppose the use of public funds for abortion. (Apr 1989)

Against the appointment of pro-choice persons to city boards. (Apr 1989)

Promote the pro-life movement’s goals in press conferences. (Apr 1989)

Promote the pro-life cause as an elected official. (Apr 1989) http://www.ontheissues.org/Harriet_Miers.htm

That was one of the reasons the liberals and the media went nuts over her, and when the conservatives did because she was a Bush crony, then her nomination was dead.

However, I made the memory mistake earlier today of thinking she was replaced by John Roberts. I was wrong. She was to have replaced O'Connor. Roberts replaced Rehnquist.

[factmart]

Harriet Meirs was prolife.

And she would not have done want happen today,

ObamaCare would be dead today,

I was behind the lynching of Meirs like most conservatives. We were wrong, Now we know how Reagan felt about some of his picks.