Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nerdgirl

How you can still say that is beyond me. She vetted Roberts and said no. But you and every other member of FR applauded the Roberts nomination. Almost to a person. The idea that Miers was an empty suit was a damn lie then and it is a damn lie now. But you got another Harvard law twerp. How’d that work out for America?


41 posted on 06/28/2012 4:12:31 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

Miers assertion about Roberts may have been correct. That doesn’t change my mind about her suitability for the Court.

Actually I’d prefer Stanford twerps, being from the West myself.


44 posted on 06/28/2012 4:14:17 PM PDT by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

Sometimes Freepers are wrong, we get it, what do you want, a medal?


45 posted on 06/28/2012 4:14:17 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

Yesterday there was a column where Lawrence Tribe claimed Justice Roberts as a law student, and he said that Roberts would vote today for Obamacare.

This sort of ties into the “rumors” Rush mentioned and to his own experience with someone who some time ago said, of all of them, “watch Roberts”.


67 posted on 06/28/2012 4:39:53 PM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson