Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2

From Rush today: “You could say that a tax on having more than one child would now be constitutional.”


66 posted on 06/28/2012 2:48:16 PM PDT by Terry Mross ( To all my kin: Do not attempt to contact me as long as you love obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Terry Mross
From Rush today: “You could say that a tax on having more than one child would now be constitutional.”

Yes...but now it would have to pass Congress and no longer can be found under "penumbras".

Liberals will no linger have the courts skirt to hide behind to make, instead of legislate, laws.

Do you not think that you can convince your fellow countrymen that laying a tax for having more than one child is a bad thing?

75 posted on 06/28/2012 3:10:24 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Terry Mross

“You could say that a tax on having more than one child would now be constitutional.”

Taxing people trying to raise families with the healthcare costs of illegal aliens and the permanent underclass is already done, so what is the difference? Taxpaying Americans are contracepting themselves into extinction, blaming the costs of those non-taxpayers who do breed (and are inheriting the earth in the process). Until Americans are willing to sacrifice to bear families, they may as well get accustomed to providing the freebies for the foreign invaders who do.


86 posted on 06/28/2012 4:32:40 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson