Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2012 1:11:09 PM PDT by DYngbld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DYngbld

Wake up, and smell the Obama Dictatorship.


2 posted on 06/28/2012 1:15:26 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld
"Every Democrat who voted for the law is going to have to own the tax hiker label.In the end, this will be a quintessentially pyrrhic victory for the President."

Their votes for this need to become an albatross to them in re-election bids.

3 posted on 06/28/2012 1:17:29 PM PDT by n230099 ("When no one knows who is armed...everyone is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

limiting the Commerce Clause is a big deal.

We should never rely on a court to make laws or un-make bad ones, that’s the job of the legislature. In this case Justice Roberts did his job to evaluate the constitutionality, rather than acting as an activist. We hate that, right?


4 posted on 06/28/2012 1:18:29 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

The law was entirely unconstitutional and Roberts allowed it. There is nothing more to say. No amount of spin or BS forgives Roberts and the other 4 for not doing their jobs.

The court, including Roberts, have really nothing to do with the American people. The Supreme Court, like Congress and certainly like Obama sees the people they are supposed to be working for as their own property. Slaves.


5 posted on 06/28/2012 1:19:37 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

The good news is we are now closer to the second revolution.

End this bullsh!t once and for all.


8 posted on 06/28/2012 1:21:25 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

I don’t see how the Supreme Court changing the language of a bill to make it “constitutional” is a “good thing”. But okay.


11 posted on 06/28/2012 1:23:21 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.


13 posted on 06/28/2012 1:25:16 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

“it was a reaffirmation of the conservative principle that the federal government and our federal system has limits.”

Wow. It will take a long time to bring the American
republic back to life. A legal precedent to control
every individual through the taxing authority will
ripple through the system for years, decades or even
generations, if at all. Do justices reverse precedent?
Not anymore.

I see the blog article is hate speech./s In order to
discourage this hatred, I’m imposing a sin tax of an
additional 45% of your income./s


16 posted on 06/28/2012 1:27:37 PM PDT by WKTimpco (Traditional Values Counter Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

Brian, you ignorant slut.


17 posted on 06/28/2012 1:27:43 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

I’m sorry, but exchanging a limitation on the commerce clause for full-blown socialism is not a win.

If Roberts wanted to challenge the commerce clause, it would have been wiser to do so on a case that doesn’t involve 1/6 of the economy of the United States. He’s taking a very big risk, if that was indeed his intent.


24 posted on 06/28/2012 1:41:55 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld
I am saying I agree.

I would like to wait till the smoke settles a bit.

I honestly don't see how Obamacare got this far in the first place. The branches of government have been withering into one mess for the last several years.

We are going to continue down this dead end road, until we actually get enough people pissed off enough to do something about it. This ruling may have been the required catalyst, it may not. Watch the spin over the next few days with caution.

28 posted on 06/28/2012 1:49:29 PM PDT by DYngbld (I have read the back of the Book and we WIN!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

This is like arguing that the French Young Guard Division reported 96 percent casualties at the Battle of Waterloo, but this is mostly good news because 4% survived.


29 posted on 06/28/2012 1:51:14 PM PDT by Pollster1 (A boy becomes a man when a man is needed - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

Seriously? Who cares where anyone was when it was read, this was horrible decision, and there is absolutely nothing good about this. Nothing good at all, unless, of course, one is rooting for America’s demise.

I am sick about this..


30 posted on 06/28/2012 1:51:53 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Do I really need a /s tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld

Another moron.


44 posted on 06/28/2012 3:07:02 PM PDT by free me (Roberts killed America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DYngbld
the fight about the breadth of the federal government’s regulatory power under the commerce clause, and the fight about the use of the federal spending power to coerce states into doing the federal government’s bidding.

We lost the fight over federal coercion through taxation to force the individual to conform to government-mandated behaviors. Once that fight is lost, it's game over. The rest is just noise.

47 posted on 06/28/2012 8:40:19 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson