You understand that this statement is true only if you live in either a deep blue or a deep red state? But for anyone living in a toss-up state, there is some real math to consider:
If I cast one vote for Romney, Obama needs *two* votes to win.
If I don't vote, Obama needs only *one* vote to win.
The math here is undeniable, but again applies only for those in states where it can be close, as in Florida in 2000.
“You understand that this statement is true only if you live in either a deep blue or a deep red state? But for anyone living in a toss-up state, there is some real math to consider:”
The math is NOT relevant. Taking a principled stand and NOT VOTING FOR ROMNEY is NOT a vote for Obama. Neither Obama or Romney should be POTUS. My failure to back a lying liberal, abortion enabler, homosexual enabler, and cultic deceiver like Romney IS NOT SUPPORT FOR OBAMA IN ANY WAY FORM OR MANNER! Also, IT IS NOT enabling Obama to win in ANY SHAPE FORM OR MANNER. It is deeply offensive to say such a thing to a person of principled conviction. How can you be so obtuse not to grasp this concept?