And the damn S.C. and every politician in D.C. will not have to abide by it, because they are exempted from all of this crap.
Backstabbing piece of shyte!!! I am beyond angry. A dark day for America. Mitt claims he would void 0-care via Executive Order. I doubt he has the cojones. We are @*%@&ed by the socialist and collectivists
Plus the SJ said to 0bama...You can keep the borders open to further disfranchise productive America, traditional America, law abiding America
Recall that Roberts held a special second swearing-in ceremony for Zero at the White House.
He is every bit as much a traitor as Arnold ... worse, in fact. He is an oathbreaker, just like 0bama, kagan, sotomayor, ginsberg, and breyer, and every worthless fascist democRat in congress that voted for this abomination.
He can burn in hell with the left bloc of the court.
God bless Justices Thomas, Scalia, and Alito.
No. Benedict Arnold was a man of principle. Roberts is a boot licking toad
Time for a revolution. Our forefathers did so for much less tyranny.
Roberts is a leftist. Bush should have picked Janice Rogers Brown who said things Like:
Janice Rogers Brown On American Government
Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible. [“A Whiter Shade of Pale,” Speech to Federalist Society (April 20. 2000)(“Federalist speech” at 8]Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled; community impoverished; religion marginalized and civilization itself jeopardized....When did government cease to be a necessary evil and become a goody bag to solve our private problems? [“Hyphenasia: the Mercy Killing of the American Dream,” Speech at Claremont-McKenna College (Sept. 16, 1999) at 3,4]In the last 100 years – and particularly in the last 30 – ...[g]overnment has been transformed from a necessary evil to a nanny – benign, compassionate, and wise. Sometimes transformation is a good thing. Sometimes, though, it heralds not higher ground but rather, to put a different gloss on Pat Moynihan’s memorable phrase, defining democracy down. [“Fifty Ways to Lose Your Freedom,” Speech to Institute of Justice (Aug. 12, 2000)(“IFJ speech”) at 2][W]e no longer find slavery abhorrent. We embrace it. We demand more. Big government is not just the opiate of the masses. It is the opiate. The drug of choice for multinational corporations and single moms; for regulated industries and rugged Midwestern farmers and militant senior citizens. [IFJ speech at 3-4]Government acts as a giant siphon, extracting wealth, creating privilege and power, and redistributing it. [Speech at McGeorge School of Law (Nov. 21, 1997) at 18][See also Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission, 953 P.2d 1188, 1212 (Cal. 1998)(Brown, J., dissenting)(referring to government as “relentless siphon.”)]
Janice Rogers Brown on the New Deal, the Great Society, and the “transmutation” of the Constitution
I have argued that collectivism was (and is) fundamentally incompatible with the vision that undergirded this country’s founding. The New Deal, however, inoculated the federal Constitution with a kind of underground collectivist mentality. The Constitution itself was transmuted into a significantly different document...1937...marks the triumph of our own socialist revolution
Clearly, they have blackmail material on Roberts...
No other explanation corresponds with his votes from the bench this week.
He will be at least spoken of along side such luminaries as David Souter.
Worse
Arnold only sold out The Country once; Roberts has already sold out The Country TWICE this week alone, and he ins in the position FOR LIFE!
I remember back when Roberts was nominated people did give a warning that he tended to favor government power. He might believe that gov’t can ban abortions but as this case and the previous case regarding marijuana growing purely for personal consumption shows he also believes gov’t has broad powers to tell you what you can do and not do unless there is an explicit prohibition to said gov’t power in the Constitution. Madison warned us about these types indirectly when he argued that the risk of having a Bill of Rights is people will tend to view the gov’t as being able to do anything as long as it was not prohibited in the Bill of Rights.
Another Bush gets Soutered.
How is he a traitor? He will be remembered as a great progressive just like Bush was!
That’s the whole point here. The GOP and DEM party are infected with the progressive disease.
Bush enabled the housing crisis...
Bush abandoned the free markets...
Bush enabled the bail-outs...
Bush enabled Obama to get elected...
Bush nominated Roberts...
Now Roberts just finished what Bush started...the total destruction of America.
I know Kennedy wrote a dissent, we'll have to see who what wrote in this decision.
First the SC holds the McCainFeingold campaign finance BS constitutional. Now under the Roberts court, Az can’t protect its borders and a mandate that was not a tax is “interpreted” as a tax. Roberts has now become the current Sandra Day Oconnor — a lib at heart—not a constitutionalist. Sad state of events. Thanks Bush
Roberts could not have done it alone. That is why he ILEGALLY Told Obama’s lady to stay on the court Even though she had previous involvement in Obama Care. He is in fact the chief law breaker on that alone as the law says she can not do that.
Now we know why he did it.
There is nothing left to be proud about being an American anymore. The communists have taken over.
So now on two high profile cases, Arizona immigration and Obamacare, Roberts has gone liberal on us.
Why is it that “conservative” justices can become more liberal, but liberal justices never become more conservative?
So many of us anticipated a 5 to 4 vote, but thought that Justice Kennedy would be the swing vote to make it 5 to 4. Sadly, we see Roberts, supposedly solidly on the conservative side, made it 5 to 4 for the liberals.
I know it over-simplifies to say the liberal side wins a complicated case, but, it’s true in the sense that this case gives a green light for government intrusion and regulation into other areas of our lives. It greatly expands governmental powers.