Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

I don’t think that’s a stretch at all, Windflier. Not a bit.


501 posted on 06/28/2012 8:09:52 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg; Windflier
I told my husband today when I found out about the decision, that it was coming up time for real rebellion. REAL rebellion.

Was talking with an extremely intelligent conservative friend today and while she hasn't decided how she's going to vote in November, she said she finds the hysteria with regard to Obama very "troubling," as it was hysteria against Bush and Republicans in general that gave us Obama, and it seems to her as if it's the same thing in reverse to vote for Romney.

I'd told her that for the first time since 1976, when I cast my first vote ever for Gerald Ford (and have voted EVERY election since), for the first time ever, I won't be voting straight Republican ticket.

I'll be voting third party at the top of the ticket because I know that there's no such thing as voting "against" a candiate. You can only vote FOR something ever, even if it's FOR thumbs-down on a ballot proposition. There is no vote "against," only FOR. So in the presidential, I will be voting FOR a plurality, the only hope we have of helping conservatives in their fight against whichever statist wins.

818 posted on 06/28/2012 2:38:17 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson