Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

Now that Obama lost that provision, he is faced with the option of refusing to enforce the law. That gets rather sticky.


3 posted on 06/25/2012 11:38:55 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Constitutionally he’s required to accept every one of these reports. He can’t ‘refuse to hear them except for the ones based on his priority.’

AZ should be able to sue the Federal government over selective compliance.


5 posted on 06/25/2012 11:40:57 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Now that Obama lost that provision, he is faced with the option of refusing to enforce the law. That gets rather sticky.>>>>>>>

Why, he’s flaunted the law since being elected.As long as we retain these parasites from both parties, we’re screwed. Look at Rubio, a Tea Party favorite, and how soon he changed.


12 posted on 06/25/2012 11:46:47 AM PDT by gunner03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
“Now that Obama lost that provision, he is faced with the option of refusing to enforce the law. That gets rather sticky.”

If my memory serves, this president has never concerned himself with the law; enforcing it or following it. And I don't see much opposition from Republicans, the kneepad media, or even ‘conservative’ talk show hosts.

Maybe things will change but thus far 0 has had carte blanche in finishing this country off.

44 posted on 06/25/2012 12:20:00 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (The GOPe has played us like a violin for the last time; high time to build the Constitution Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson