Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stephenjohnbanker

“The federal government would have us believe (and the Court today agrees) that even that is forbidden.”

If the federal government were to remove habeaus corpus because it enabled ‘stricter enforcement’, would that be considered ok? Just because it’s stricter doesn’t make it any less unconstitutional. AZ can enforce the federal law - no more or no less. They do not have the authority to alter the federal law however they see fit.


30 posted on 06/25/2012 11:56:30 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
If the federal government were to remove habeaus corpus because it enabled ‘stricter enforcement’, would that be considered ok?

They did: NDAA.

35 posted on 06/25/2012 12:02:41 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson