Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster
This opinion paves the way for the feds to take action against “sanctuary cities.”

Must we wait for the Feds to take action? That might be a long wait depending on who's in power. Can't someone bring suit now against a sanctuary city based on this ruling?

71 posted on 06/25/2012 9:50:44 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: kevao

A private citizen would run into the same legal problem that Arizona ran into at the Supreme Court. It’s a federal, not state, local or private issue. I would bet that a Federal Court would toss out such a suit on the basis that the private citizen does not have standing to assert the claim.

It is still a political issue. The fact that a branch of government is not performing its job function does not grant any other branch the legal authority to step in and fill that function. It is a political question up to the electorate to hold elected representatives accountable for their malfeasance.

This site is about upholding the principles of the United States as a Constitutional Republic. Well, that is how a Constitutional Republic is supposed to work. Forcing it to do anything else means it is no longer a Constitutional Republic. While the United States probably is no longer a Constitutional Republic already, it’s not logically justifiable to make it something other than a Constitutional Republic that we want as opposed to what the left wants.


81 posted on 06/25/2012 10:54:02 AM PDT by henkster (Why should I care? Why should I care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson