I understood they sent that provision back to the lower court for reconsideration.
Same thing they did here in 2000 Bush/Gore debacle. Same difference.
I understood they sent that provision back to the lower court for reconsideration.
Yup. They didn’t uphold it. They just punted on it. So there is nothing in this ruling for us to cheer.
Nah, they just refused to address it, while offering some guidelines in the event it’s litigated.