Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette

Wrong, wrong, wrong. This was a huge loss. The “unanimous” of which you speak was only about asking for papers in the abstract. And of course there is not a problem with that if there is reason to suspect. however, that part was remanded, there are other suits that will arise about it’s application. It may yet be struck down for other reasons.

But, hey, the talking heads can spin this any way they want so some of you can sleep at night. As they whittle away America one ruling at a time, all we do are read headlines and listen to pundits. Sad.


155 posted on 06/25/2012 8:34:24 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: RIghtwardHo

“..there are other suits that will arise about it’s application.”

*****

Bingo. This isn’t going to go away any time soon.

You can bet the ACLU and La Raza types are preparing for a new round of suits over racial profiling & probable cause issues and what “reason to suspect” means.

You only have to look at the abhorrent Federal attitude towards airport security to see the future.

A Government that effectively institutionalizes feeling up 90 year old nuns and teenage girls to avoid hurting the ever so delicate sensibilities of a bunch of muzzies is going to come down like a ton of bricks on AZ if the race pimps can convince ‘em that “reason to suspect” mean’s “working class and brown.”


176 posted on 06/25/2012 8:57:59 AM PDT by gzzimlich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson