Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
You mean you think the Republican party is so entitled to my conservative vote that my refusal to sanction a candidate on record for promoting FIVE major liberal agendas, is "throwing a tantrum"?
This "tantrum" is one I hope spreads enough to make whichever guys wins, yours or the Democrats', ridiculed internationally and despised domestically because nearly two in three Americans voted against him. I will be voting FOR helping conservatives in Congress fight whichever guy wins by making him that politically injured.
You tell yourself that you'll be voting "against" Obama, but you will also be voting for advancing the liberal agenda on the back of the Republican party. That, VVV, is what you will be voting FOR. No wonder you have to scold me for having a "temper tantrum" -- it's your only escape.
I don’t see it as a setup. Maybe it is but I don’t see it.
The economic depression will sink Obama. He is gone. He has no chance. One term wonder. Your local street corner hooker could beat Obama in this economy.
Sarah voting for ABO?
That one will reverberate thru FR.
Yup.
Here are Sarah Palin's words verbatim (and link to video of full interview with Sean Hannity):
"Yes, if that vote were to be taken today, obviously I would vote for Governor Romney over President Barack Obama - in a heartbeat - I wouldn't blink - because I go back to what I said at the beginning: ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!"
~ Sarah Palin on "Hannity" (June 19, 2012)
Check out Sarah's comments re: the above statement starting at about 4:03 minutes into the video.
And just for the record: I am NO Mittbot. However, I will crawl over broken glass to vote for Obama's opponent on November 6, 2012. IMO, this country cannot survive another four years of Obozo's Marxist shenanigans.
We have an election to win. And a country to keep.
Mittens has won the nomination.
Now he needs to win the White House and the opportunity to disprove our predictions about him!
And we need to make sure enough congressmen and senators are elected to make sure he etches the right sketch!
Despite all that we still are in a position to win , and change things.
The way I see it know, is we have a crappy potential commander and a reluctant Army.
We need to vote in all the Conservative Jr Officers and Non Comms we can find.
We have to give the current Commander the old heave ho over the fan tail.
Don't compare LIBERAL Romney to RINO McCain. McCain served our country! McCain didn't initiated same sex marriage and he was not a baby killing candidate!
'Try' to be honest and compare liberal MITT with liberal OBAMA.
Both are godless creatures
Both appointed liberal judges
Both initiated Socialistic healthcare named after themselves!
Both are PRO abortion
Both are for same sex marriage
and Mitt both initiated it and, then, personally married many of them
Both are KNOWN LIARS
Both never served their country and neither did their family
BOTH have 'accomplishments' that DEGRADE America.
Both hates conservatism
Both are evil
And that list is NOT what America is about. That belongs to one nation under evil.
Correct.
...Another Obama term means the Obamacare repeal fails.
Failure to repeal Obamacare means our Republic is lost.
I am stunned that the people who refuse to vote for Romney can’t see this. I’m stunned that they would even risk Obama’s re-election victory in this light.
I am stunned as well. You and I are on the exact same page, FRiend. God help us all if Obama gets a second term... {{shudder}}
I can respect those Freepers who honestly believe Romney is just as evil, damaging, and harmful to the US Republic as Obama is. I don’t buy that for a minute, but I respect those who honestly feel that way.
I have far less respect for those who say “well Romney is an abortionist, so I refuse to vote for him.” I respect their point of view if their religion precludes them from voting for any abortionist.
But in the context of my post about Sir Winston Churchill,
if we end up with Obama, we still get an abortionist. So what does one gain by wasting his vote by not voting for Romney, and ending up with the abortionist Obama.
A man like Churchill, if loath to vote for an abortionist, would still analyze with clear cool shrewdness that the next president was guaranteed to be an abortionist either way, and then would move on to the next issue at hand regarding the two candidates.
In this case, I know I am getting an abortionist, so I might as well vote for the one who might sign an Obamacare repeal, than for me to waste my vote and allow the re-election of the abortionist who will not sign an Obamacare repeal over his dead body.
I’m just bringing logic to the analysis instead of indulging in my emotional/spiritual sanctity of so many hear so they can feel good about their votes, even as the cut off my noses to spite their faces.
Dabbled? Dabbled?
The man created and signed into law RomneyCare, the father of ObamaCare!
He "dabbled" alright!
But NO problem with baby killing and same sex marriage?? What kind of woman are those? WEAK EXCUSE, there twink! Now they are supporting cheating a baby a right to live! And those that do 'get to live', homos can raise them - cheating them out of normalcy and goodness. They are bowing to the worst evil now and an accomplice to it with supporting those who endorse and enforce it!! Tainted forever.
And when women care so much about adultery to interfere with voting for the BEST for America - I'd say they are taking their personal experiences before our country.
Pure and simply WRONG.
Tell me, if an independent or a disillusioned Democrat doesn't vote for Obama and instead goes third party like I will, is that still a vote for Obama? Or is it a vote for Romney?
There's only one way to vote for Obama, and that's to mark your ballot for him. I will mark my ballot for a third-party candidate and pray that enough others do the same so that whoever wins gets such a sick plurality that our conservatives in Congress will be able to dominate him.
Just what is the BEST for America?
Who do you vote for?
Would you take on the whole lot by rejecting the animated contest of freedom?
A little dab’l do ya’?
It is! do the math!
You’d best pray for the Senate.
Hmmm...Kay Baily, Dewhurst or Cruz....
Hmmm
When Cruz wins many here will be bitching that he is pro Hispanic and I will be smiling wide that he is the most viable conservative and a Senator.
I swear, ABO makes people have to contort so ridiculously!
So you are saying that MATHEMATICALLY, an independent or disillusioned Democrat who doesn't vote for Obama but instead votes third party, is still voting "for" Obama? Because any vote not for Romney is the same as a vote for Obama?
Man, I really don't get new math!
Extremely well said.
As you probably know, Churchill also said something about siding with the Devil if it would get rid of Hitler.
Equating Romney with Hitler is not rational.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.