To: sickoflibs
I am sorry, 'refusing to testify under oath' is different than Holder lying to Congress.
We knew at least on two points Holder lied under oath - 1) he testified he did not talk to Obama about F&F; 2) he retracted claim on Bush AG
Roger Clemens just went through 'lying to Congress under oath'. Eric Holder as AG did just that. Who in DoJ is going to prosecute that? We know Holder definitely will not.
61 posted on
06/20/2012 10:13:59 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
RE :”
Eric Holder as AG did just that. Who in DoJ is going to prosecute that? We know Holder definitely will not. “
That is my point. Holder is running the show. Republicans in the House know this.
62 posted on
06/20/2012 10:17:53 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
To: Sir Napsalot
RE :”
I am sorry, ‘refusing to testify under oath’ is different than Holder lying to Congress.”
The main difference is that those under GWB refusing to testify were WH advisors(Rove was one) , not confirmed officials like Holder who must testify.
Conyers called them in to set a perjury trap for them but they refused to come.
68 posted on
06/20/2012 10:38:38 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson