<>She knew the day before the hearing how much was in there.<>
She wasn’t being questioned the day before the hearing.
Point out the perjury in the transcript:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2895056/posts
She said they were indigent. She said they had no income. She said they had no income. She was charged with perjury for good reason. The new tapes make it clear she knew the money was in there. She lied. So did he. That will be a problem for him if he asks the judge to dismiss the charges based on Stand Your Ground. How can the judge believe anything he says now? I do not believe him. But then I never believed his original story. It was not believable then and less so now.