What the hell? Do you even realize what you're saying? What you're saying is akin to saying that voting for a particular food is a waste because arsenic and cyanide are going to win.
Romney was never my candidate but my candidates either refused to run, shot themselves in the foot or were beaten by Romney in a fair fight.
Ah, so you're the sort who, if you were a girl, would swoon over a guy if he beat up a rival for your love?
So nice to know is that all it takes is "a fair fight" and not anything like character.
He will not be ideal (and we won’t even get into his religion) but compared to this Communist he is 100x better for our nation.
I disagree with you even there; he will be worse and here's how: Obama at least has a polarizing effect. With a Romney presidency lots of people will think "we did our job, we changed things! We put a republican in the White House" but sadly they are entirely mistaken; Romney will do NOTHING to reverse the policies that Obama has started. At best he will only slow the policies.
Elect an overwhelmingly GOP Congress with more conservatives and Romney will not be a problem.
The same can be said for Obama; that makes such statment of null value in arguing a vote for Romney.
Congress can say “no” to his goofy ideas as well as those of The Disaster.
Gee. They could say that to a President Obama, or a President Paul, or a President Gingrich. Again, this has null-value as an argument to vote for Romney.
Four more years of this and you can say goodbye to our future. That is not principled.
If it takes another 1776, then so be it. I will not vote for Romney.
Adams was often wrong and I do not take him as my guide nor do I consider his statement applicable to today.
It may be that he was often wrong; though I think not in this.
Far too many people are worried by "winnable" to actually strive. And that is a detriment to us all.
2) walk your sexual confusion elsewhere I am not interested. I don't go whining about how the Chicago Bears are REALLY the greatest team in the NFL even though the Super Bowl is OVER and they didn't play.
3) I doubt your judge of “character” is anything of interest to anyone other than the local chapter of Crackpots Anonymous.
4) while it is difficult to have a lower opinion of the American electorate than I do, what you predict will not be the case. VERY few people are willing to let Willard go his own way and this election is a watershed event. They are showing signs of becoming aroused and that will not change for a while. It will only change quicker than the natural course of events would take it if many people buy your phony line of “PUNT”. Should the Disaster win it would completely demoralize the Right and make attacks on the Tea Party and Conservatism 100x easier and more effective. You clearly have no clue about political momentum or what makes and breaks it.
5) you would have been bitching in 1776 that “Washington is too moderate, too conciliatory, worked for the British, is no better than King George...” and other such crap.
You Super “Conservatives” are such total phonies. I look at things ONLY from the perspective of what is best for our nation in the eyes of a patriot. There is NO way for a true patriot to justify any action which helps The Disaster stay in an office he is constitutionally ineligible for. No rhetoric can cover helping someone not a Natural Born Citizen sit in that office. No principle of any value can aid that illegality.