Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chicken head

As disgusting as it was to view that crap, it is apparent that the ‘pinup’ feamle is not Ann Dunham because the noses are different. The side-by-side frame shows Ann Dunham’s nose turned slightly down at the end while the pinup princess has a nose which turned slightly up on the end. Salacious might sell books, but it is fantasy.


82 posted on 06/15/2012 10:33:10 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
As disgusting as it was to view that crap, it is apparent that the ‘pinup’ feamle is not Ann Dunham because the noses are different. The side-by-side frame shows Ann Dunham’s nose turned slightly down at the end while the pinup princess has a nose which turned slightly up on the end. Salacious might sell books, but it is fantasy.

If you watch the video at the link, you can see images of the teeth. Stanley Ann had a crooked upper left lateral incisor, and so does the Nude woman in the photographs.

Beyond that, the article at the end of the link shows that Gilbert PROVED beyond any reasonable doubt that the Photographs were taken at 2994 Kalihi in Frank Marshall's house. I'm sorry, but it is no longer reasonable to claim that Stanley Ann was not the nude woman. The evidence (of which i've only mentioned a couple of pieces) is simply overwhelming. The Nude woman *IS* Stanley Ann Dunham.

84 posted on 06/15/2012 10:52:25 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson